Each tower was buzzed by a crash-monitoring day-stealth aircraft. In the recently circulated "fireman" shot of the North Tower receiving the first crashbombing airliner, it appears (see description below and check the video referenced) -- there is another day-stealth aircraft (shown below in four stills) that buzzed the towers just as the second plane hits South Tower.

YES! There is a mysterious flying object that appears in the sky seen above the streetlight well to the left of the twin towers after the second "zoom out" of the camera in the last quarter of the clip, (i.e. about two seconds after he pans back from the close-up of the smoke above the roof), approximately at the beginning of the last fifth of the entire segment. At this point the envelope of flame has greatly diminished -- the object appears to do a fly-by of the target site. It rises from the left, from behind the buildings visible along the left side of the street. (-- does it pass in front of or behind the North Tower and the smoke?)

http://www.xemox.net/wtc/movies/first.plane.hits.gp.med.asf

But this object has exactly the same presenting characteristics as the unidentified object captured streaking past the South Tower when it was hit -- a clip which has been around for some time (I'm looking for copy to share both together.) Here are stills of it from Drudge:

http://www.drudgereport.com/flash91.htm

But please note the EXTREME IMPORTANCE of this wholly impossible double coincidence of day-stealth aircraft streaking by at the moment of each of the two WTC crashbombing events: this means that "Moslem Fundamentalists" could not have been involved -- why not?

1. They lack the sophistication for day-stealth monitoring equipment.

2. If they could get a stealth aircraft to fly by at the moment of aircraft impact, they could just as well, IF they were Arabs, could just as well have used the stealth aircraft to bomb the buildings and spare the lives of their own operatives.

3. The high-tech day-stealth aircraft can only have had one of two missions: either:

(a) To shoot down the airliners if they failed to hit their targets in order to make sure that no passenger, crew or double-crossed hijackers lived to testify to the fact that the hijacked plane's flight control was captured by remote controllers; or

(b) To provide some "Mr. Big" with close up shots of the successfully completed mission (assuming such a one exists based on the apparent glee of the covert-Mossad-agent (as has been disclosed) Israelis who were arrested for laughing and exulting as they watched the Towers going down.

Further correction and clarification of anomalous object(s)

I'm wrong. And I missed something BIG.

With my 200 mhz and slow microsoft player system I missed the action. Able to watch the "firemen video" in, at most, two-second increments with 30 seconds pauses -- I mistook a bird for the object people were talking about (I should have read more carefully before looking at the pictures!)

My error corrected by good ol' Webfairy:

”Nah, that one is just a bird, taking off somewhere in the midrange.

”The real deal is coming from behind the brown building on the right flying toward tower 1 at incredible speed. You cannot see this without Quicktime, which has much better resolution and sharper processing routines than whatever Microsoft uses.

http://www.taner.net/wtc/media/First_Plane_Crash_SLOW_.mpeg

”I made an animated gif, but apparently it is defective unless saved
locally. It's supposed to loop, showing the whole sequence.

Click Here

”Something is traveling very, very, very fast and dive bombing into the building from a 1:00 position. Since whatever this is was moving faster than the debris cloud moved by a factor of 5, I would guess it was traveling plenty fast to make the sonic boom heard in the version with the original sound.”

End Webfairy quote

-------------------------------------------

NOTE HOWEVER THAT THIS DOES NOT CHANGE THE CONCLUSION THAT THE OPERATION WAS TOO HIGH-TECH FOR "ISLAMIC FUNDAMENTALISTS,” WHO IF THEY HAD THIS TECH WOULD NOT HAVE RESORTED TO SUICIDE MARTYRDOM IF THEY COULD JUST USE A MISSILE. IF THERE WERE ANY ARABS THEY DID NOT FIRE THE "FIRST BLOOD" MISSILE IN THIS SHOT -- THEY DID NOT USE THE GROUND HUGGING CRUISE MISSILE THAT TOOK OUT THE NAVAL INTELLIGENCE UNIT AT THE PENTAGON.

Another correction of my "bird" mistake:

http://www.taner.net/wtc/media/First_Plane_Crash_SLOW_.mpeg

I'm playing this on Quicktime. Maybe that makes it clearer, I can't tell.

This is from the Firemen video that captured the first crash. Notice the plane coming down like it's dive bombing the tower.

This film clip shows the same sequence twice. You can see some blurry object approaching the tower from an extreme angle. The blurry thing goes straight through to create the explosion in one smooth motion.

I have to register QuickTime before I can break it down into frames, but I think you'll be able to see this without a lot of help.

This is the scene with the action, but you need Quicktime to see it. (I can't -- but I know and trust the measure of scientific ability and the objectivity those who have the right equipment and are reporting what they see.)

Click Here

From: "Adam Monson" sovereign50@qwest.net
To: apfn@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 7:40 PM
Subject: Re: [APFN] did any one see the "mysterious" flying object in this clip??

I remember seeing this clip on Sept 11th on NBC. I had my TV on all day watching these clips over and over again. In the original clip you CAN see the airplane for a split second. Watch the fireman look up and behind, at the same time you can hear the airplane going over head and there is a pedestrian to the right looking up as well.

----

THIS DISCUSSION MISSES THE REAL SIGNIFICANT EVIDENCE WHICH IS THE OTHER OBJECT THAT APPEARS ABOVE THE STOPLIGHT AFTER THE SECOND PAN-AWAY AT THE BEGINING OF THE LAST FIFTH OF THE CLIP -- THE AIRCRAFT AND THE SOUND IT MAKES AND THE CRASH ARE NOT THE SIGINFICANT DATA IN THE CASE THIS EVIDENCE MAKES AGAINST THE GOVERNMENT AND IN DEFENSE OF "ISLAMIC FUNDAMENTALISTS" --

-----

Adam Monson wrote:
Neil Donaldson wrote:

...It’s near the end of the clip and seems to circle the first building just after the first plane explodes...

----

Download Windows Media Player:
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/mediaplayer/download/default.asp

Detailed view of 911 air routes:
www.usatoday.com/graphics/news/gra/gflightpath2/flash.htm

------------------------------------

Andrea P_____ of New York City writes:

Dear Mr. Eastman,

You are correct but you need to include Condolezza Rice. I agree with your impeachment and add charges of First Degree Murder, and Conspiracy to Commit Murder, Sedition, Treason. And they have really felt they were committing a covert coup d'etat. Notice the 'shadow' government in operation? This is not paranoia; these people need to be fired.

Not too many weeks after the Trade Center catastrophe, I contacted the NY attorney general's office to exhort them to conduct an investigation independent of FEMA. I was concerned about a former federal 'castrophe' agency that around May 18, 2001 (Front page bottom of "World Wide Column of WSJ), Cheney funded and turned FEMA into an agency to handle things greater than a flood. I wondered what they were planning.

I witnessed the towers burn that morning and had acquaintances' family, others at the sight tell me about the explosions in the towers which provide some support to the idea that the WTC towers were professionally demolished by professionally and deliberately placed explosives beginning at the very top of 2WTC.

The drivel about the 2nd tower crashing more quickly because the 2nd plane was flying faster is to cover the screw up that the Administration/CIA, et al made with 2WTC when it was demolished first: the plane hit below the half way point after the first plane hit 1WTC, but only a short time before 2WTC began to cave, and yet the very top of 2WTC began to explode, not more logically to buckle where the plane hit.

Real terrorists would not have cared about how the buildings were going to come down; more likely wanted as much damage as possible, so according to the terrorists, let the towers 'fall over'. More deliberate (CIA/FBI) terrorists under orders from the decision makers only wanted the WTC to be destroyed, however, as well as where the CIA, FBI, SEC, IRS offices in 7WTC, where no planes hit, and which were a block away from 1WTC.

There were also explosives professionally placed in 7WTC which was professionally demolished early that evening. The NY Times writes this disinformation about how the building was in bad condition because flaming jet fuel and of the very large tanks of PCB laced transformer oil which according to independent as well as earlier liable - Andrea Bernstein/WNYC - accounts were many times the size the NY TImes later reported. But little effort was made to save that building due to the trauma of the day.

The NY attorney general's chief investigator hung up on me when I exhorted an independent investigation outside of FEMA and the FBI, which are protecting the Executive Branch and the military industrial complex, and large soft money campaign contributors.

Bin Laden and even Sadam Hussein within perhaps a couple days, condemned the catastrophe, but both inferred or directly said 'that we deserved it, or brought in on ourselves'. Coincidently, the IRA had committed an act of terrorism for which they claimed; I realized that terrorist groups 'claim' their acts of terrorism and that Bin Laden is not responsible for what happened.

Recently, on WNYC, a former State Department official stated that often, the Pentagon and the Executive branch, which assume that the American people need some boogy man in order to fuel emotional support for things such as military action - now that is not saying that the Pentagon has any true defense reason for the military action. But in order to get American support, they use a 'Bin Laden' as a lighting rod to obtain taxpayer/voter support. In the case of Afghanistan, the civil war was preventing oil companies and oil service companies from doing business there, and so this was all schemed, and the military contractors - also large soft money campaign contributors, get some of the taxpayer action.

Rumsfeld and this information agency - it will answer to the CIA or NSA, under the DCI? But not under Rumsfeld. He has said that in order for the Administration to achieve its end, it will lie about the truth.

Unless the GOP puts up better candidates, I am voting Democrat - one who opposes this 'war' which is the cloak for the waste of taxpayer money to serve the interests of the soft money campaign contributors, the SUV drivers, the military contractors, and who ever else was involved with this depravity, including any Wall Street Investment Banks and bankers.

Yours sincerely,
Andrea P______
New York

----------------------------------------------------

Dick Eastman wrote:

This accusation made by :
Dick Eastman of 223 S. 64th Ave., Yakima, Washington 98908

I accuse President Bush, Richard Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz with the first degree murder in their complicity and approval of the deaths of thousands of New Yorkers and Afghans in a criminal operation involving the destruction of the New York World Trade Center on September 11, 2001 and the cruise missile bombing of the Pentagon in Washington D.C. on the same day.

Their purpose was to create a fraudulent pretext for a war of conquest against Afghanistan and to murder members of the Office of Naval Intelligence in the Pentagon who they knew would discover and expose their conspiracy were these loyal military personnel to survive to investigate the New York murders.

The Crash-Monitoring Day-Stealth Air Craft
By Dick Eastman, with others

eastman@compwrx.com

Information sent in e-mail:

Subject: 2+2 beats 911: Day-stealth fly-by monitor of both tower crashes caught on video HERE'S WHAT THEY PROVE: Moslem Fundamentalists NOT involved in super-high tech terror frame-up.

Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 21:54:41 -0800
Attachment: wt4.jpg (22k), wt2.jpg (23k), wt1.jpg (24k), wt3a.jpg (24k)

And the correction in the following e-mail:

Subject: Correction: I mistook bird; Real "Fireman Video" evidence is "first-blood" missile visible on outlook not ms player

Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 07:51:46 -0800
Attachment: crash1.gif (234k)

The Crash-Monitoring Day-Stealth Air Craft
by Dick Eastman with others

Back to The Collapse of the Twin Towers Menu for Item 3, "Pictures of Anomalous Objects Caught Around the WTC on 11 September"

Phase 1 “Know” Menu
Looking for Justice in All the Wrong Places Menu
Insights-Reflections-Analysis Menu
Covering Up the Cover Up Menu
The Reality of Israeli Zionist Infiltration Menu
Are We On the Path of Expanding Liberty or Tyranny?
Declaring Independence and A State of Global Rebellion Menu
A Picture of the Stars and A Voice from the Ethers Menu
Interim Addendums During Phase 1